The new trend that is being employed by some of the most flourishing directors and screenwriters in film is with the use of real time in terms of storytelling. Adela is one of those films which made it right. The story’s development is loaded with all those activities happening in a day. You will never doubt Adela’s energy to do all those things for her age. And yet, it adheres to the most essential elements of a film despite the time constraint. It’s good to know that the film was shot for seven days not really a day in Adela’s life. It might be physically impossible for an actress like Anita Linda to conform to the idea of real time. I don’t want to meddle with the theories behind it as it’s a different issue. What is important is Anita Linda’s performance with of course Adolfo Alix’s directing. Despite her age and the director’s idea of real time storytelling (usually happens in a day), Adela is one that I will never get tired of watching. It is simply because; Linda is magnificent!
Adela turns eighty years old. It seems another ordinary day to her life. She goes to the market. She prepares the ingredients for the pansit bihon (vermicelli noodle dish). She expects a visit from her daughter to celebrate her birthday with her. She goes to the church. She visits the grave of her husband. She also visits her son in the prison. And come back to her shanty and wait with much hope that somehow, something extraordinary is in store for her that day.
The shabby production design is apparently shot in the junkyard part of Manila. Despite its understated setting, the moment Linda simply passes by the area; it made the entire place enchanting. I am at a loss for words on how great her performance was. Linda is the very key to the success of this film and I have no doubt about it. Alix’s directing skills with a handful of films as his backup might have contributed a lot in bringing the best from Linda. If this has been done by a different director, I have this feeling that it would get messed up. And for the role of Adela, I have exactly the same precognition. It is quite tedious to demonstrate a wide range of emotions with subtlety and Linda has done it with style.
When I review Alix’s film, it certainly appears to be short. Adela is a story which transpires in a day. The simplistic nature of the film threatens to belie its profundity for the unseasoned viewer. No dramatizations, no histrionics, just the stark goings-on of an ordinary woman’s life. Precisely this is what Filipino films lack, brevity. Before, I really have doubts with their ideologies in its incorporation of real time for film perspective. I basically view real time as something theoretical in nature, and will possibly distort its own views. I felt that Alix has done a good task in this. I have a fair grasp of this supposed new trend in films.
Adela is Alix’s best work so far. After all, seeing a legend on the screen is one rare opportunity. Linda is simply stunning. Her past works might have not been very visible in our local theatres as well as in television. Adela is one film you will certainly be blessed to see a performance that requires a luminary presence and charisma. Anita Linda has such qualities.
Charlie Koon's Rating:
11.06.2008
Count Your Blessings
11.04.2008
Maling Akala
Maling Akala is co-directed by Veronica B. Velasco and Pablo Biglang-awa Jr.
10.28.2008
My Only Ü
My Only Ü opens October 29, 2008 in theaters nationwide.
Altar
Altar will be screened at IndieSine, Robinsons Galleria from October 29 - November 4, 2008.
10.24.2008
Mishaps and Miscasts
Every film has its strengths and weaknesses. At times they qualify on certain aspects and wane on others because of elusiveness. Ambitiously persistent, the character Sisa is brought again in the limelight. But its light has faded and turned dim. The historical perspective lacks precision. Its elaborate set design is a bit quizzical. The set of clothes looks like a tailoring made for an amateur high school play. Its deliberate use of theatrical style did not correspond to the very aim of the film which is characterization, centered on human emotions. The characters in the film come out as embellishments and caricatures. This material is so grand which needs to be backed by a good financier. But why not give all you got if they believe in their undertaking.
Narcisa “Sisa” Dalangin (Jodi Sta. Maria-Lacson) is a young Filipina lass living during the Spanish Occupation. She lives with her grandmother Ising in a tiny hut. Pedro Magbuhos (Carlo Maceda) tries to get Sisa’s empathy. But Juanito (Christian Vasquez) is more esteemed to seize Sisa’s heart. Things changed when Pedro disclose a hearsay to the Guardia Civil that Ising is a member of the cult group Confradia. This prompted her to be imprisoned but later dies due to an accident. Soon enough, Sisa was caught by Pedro in the woods and was beaten and eventually she was raped. Then, they were married for that matter and had two children: Basilio and Crispin.
I am quite confounded with the casting of some characters. Padre Damaso (Dido dela Paz) is supposed to be pure Spanish. That character is a complete bastard, but he must possess this imperative charisma in a wicked way which dela Paz has failed to recognize. Dona Consolacion (Aleck Bovick) has achieved a circus-like characterization in terms of makeup but her performance has tendencies to be over-the-top. The director must have guided her in delivering a bitchy attitude with a more humanitarian bearing. Maceda as Pedro is wearing a tight fitting pajama in the entire film which is deeply unappealing. It is just goofy in a way to watch period films with misconceived understanding of accurate clothing. The accessibility is more prioritized than suitable casting. But it is all true that bad casting ruins a great aspect of the film’s authenticity and sincerity.
Sisa’s character is indeed the most vibrant character in the novel Noli Me Tangere (Touch Me Not). Aside from her surname, there is nothing new to my senses offered in this film. Andaluz’s Sisa lacks vision to give a new perspective of Sisa that will mark his directorial debut. The execution is nothing triumphant. It has a certain feel of dreariness. At some point, you might suspect the directors’ lack of confidence over the material itself. Filipino Period Films must enable to convey or let a feel to the audience of a certain degree of authenticity. It did try to experiment with its editing technique to make it more contemporary and appealing to the youth but it is not careful with its function. That is why its result looks cheap and gimmickry. Its zoom lens is all used up just to give some spice to each scene but has not achieved a positive effect that it purportedly put across. Instead, it gives a severe confusion with its technique.
Something that is right in this film is no other than Sta. Maria-Lacson herself as Sisa. I could feel her endeavor to rightly portray a delicate character. Sisa lost her reason and state of mind in the end, indeed. But it’s her heart that is most seen. She made us understand the significance of her plight and her passiveness. Her acting is not perfect but it’s most favorable I have seen in recent years. And she is an attractive Sisa. This makes me wonder of the implication of the controversial confrontation scene between Rizal and Sisa. Jose Rizal knows Sisa during childhood. Rizal knows that Sisa did have a happy life. Sisa is with her lover contrary to what is narrated in the story and in the film. Although the confrontation is a bit staged, Rizal answers her back that Sisa will forever be in the heart of every Filipino.
.
10.23.2008
Let the Culture War Rage
Irony plays a big element in these hapless yet quite hopeful social beings which originated from the tenants of the railways. It is a mixture of hysteria, paranoia that has outwardly corrupted the ethics of the known squalors of Philippine Society. Give them a crying statue of the Virgin Mother Mary, they will acquire faith. They will flagellate their selves within a given opportunity. Give them a few metal scraps, some tube and powder; without any difficulty they make a gun. It’s a free killing world. Yes it is.
Helen (Aiza Marquez) travels during Semana Santa (Lenten Season) to Southville. She wants to ensure a housing unit named under her Auntie Jessica (Ana Capri). When she arrives in the village, she was helped by Bro. Girlie, (Bo Vicencio) a faux faith healer. She soon visited the unit but was repelled by a group of gay syndicates, headed by Kirat (also played by Bo Vicencio). Then she stayed again for a little longer in the Chapel of Crying Virgin and assisted Bro. Girlie’s healing antics. Soon enough, Bro. Virgie’s father Mang Lazaro tries to rape Helen. This resorts her to stay in another house by two helpful brothers: Barok and Abel.
Ala Pobre, Ala Suerte is the third installment of the Ala Verde series. Unfortunately, I was not able to see the two previous films namely Ala Verde, Ala Pobre and Ala Suerte, Ala Muerte. It is advised to watch this film with caution. If you think that their lives in the railways are worse, you might be befuddled with how shoddier their lives has become in Southville. At times, the story’s progression is illogical. But boy, this film made me scurrying from my wee-wee break not to miss any of its sequences.
The story’s progression is flabbergasting. It is confidently maneuvered most especially with its bizarre scenarios. Helen’s character has instantly been in the swing of things with Bro. Girlie. When Helen moved to Abel’s house, she agreed without hesitation. Every scenario leads to a provocation. This in the end has justly been vindicated. You know, I have great admiration with how Santos has drawn a society with a great appeal of sordidness without loosening its artistic panache. Surprisingly, his experimental techniques are not amateurish. But rather it is a well-thought-of aesthetics in its entirety.
Bo Vicencio has made me applaud for his versatility. He played the character so well and so rich, this is the first time I clapped during its credits. As well as Carlo Migue’s demanding portrayal as a drug addict and pusher is very much admired. Despite his flaws, he was able to have a good rapport with a possible love pair with Helen. Ana Capri’s short performance has shown her range of emotions like rage, grief and repression. Aiza Marquez as the heroine Helen has weaved the story in a way that you will never get to notice that her mere presence is enough to have chaos.
At times we get too attached with our malevolent nature. It is a healthy exercise of how films must be. It is free flowing. It is willing to convey the lives of both innocent and culpable. We might not agree with how this works. The film lacks a clear course of action. But there is still a possibility of escape. Ala Pobre, Ala Suerte has delivered a just rendition of a society that has tarnished. It has not yet escaped its past’s bigotry. But it tries to move along and survive.
10.21.2008
Cinemanila Day Five: Controversial
From the five films I have seen, my top two film choices are:Favorable Performances:
10.19.2008
Cinemanila Day Three: Jampacked Screenings

Ang Manghuhula is shown an hour late from its suppose screening. The casts are are also present like Chanda Romero, Glaiza de Castro, Emilio Garcia and Pinky Amador.(Star-studded gala night) But I did not see Eula Valdez. They also offered free popcorn, soda, bottled water and even Starbucks Coffee! (I did not get any of their freebies as I might get biased in reviewing the film... haha) Anyway, they also have prizes in the end. Paolo Herras is also there.
10.18.2008
Cinemanila Day Two: Good Vibes
For the updates, I have seen Ala Pobre, Ala Suerte and Sisa (both for Digital Lokal Competition). I will post my reviews of these films soon. I am glad to see Lav Diaz in both screenings. (Filmmakers are more of a celebrity to me) Briccio Santos is also there together with his casts. The heroine Aiza Marquez who played Helen is so cute up-close. In the film, the drug pusher Abel played by Carlo Migue is also there. I was surprised to hear him talk and I have to say that he played the character so well. (Smells like a new indie actor on the rise to stardom) The versatile actor Bo Vicencio is also there. Ana Capri watched both films together with Tikoy Aquiluz. The second screening started thirty minutes late from its suppose 9PM showing. I think they are planning to have a small chit-chat/introduction but did not push through. I did not see Jodi Santamaria-Lacson but some of the casts are there.
.
I will also post my predictions once I have seen all films in competition. (Digital Lokal only since its all Filipino Films)
10.15.2008
Music Madness
Behind one’s music, there is madness. Musical composers are sometimes mistaken as crazy people. Ariel (Coke Bolipata) is no different. His reclusive nature demeans every playful child in the shelter whenever they listen while he is playing the violin. His ardor for music might be too arrogant. Most of the times, his mood swings are outrageous. But beneath his cruel demeanor, he endures a past affair that haunts him endlessly even in his dreams.
The funny thing is I am more fascinated to talk about Ariel than Onyok (Julian Duque). Onyok is the mute child in the film. I always see to it that every time I make reviews, I watch it in theatres. For Boses, I screened it with the kids in Cultural Center of the Philippines. Based on my observation, I think they liked it.
Boses is the story of Onyok, a mute child that is constanly abused by his father Marcelo (Ricky Davao). His back is made to be a cigar ashtray. There are speculations that he became mute due to an object inserted in his mouth and infected his larynx. One night, a neighbor reported an incident to the authorities, leading Onyok to stay in a shelter headed by Amanda (Cherry Pie Picache). Despite Onyok’s reluctance in his new environment, he is enthralled with the eclectic resonance of Ariel’s violin exploits. Ariel is arrogant to almost everyone and Onyok is no exemption. But when Ariel realizes through his sister Amanda the traumatic events from Onyok, the two slowly develop a harmony in their passion for playing violin.
I might be baffled with how our culture works with this kind of abuses. In our Filipino Culture, we are well-acquainted to harsh disciplines. An intention does not really matter as these are prevailing methods in child discipline to most parents. I will not dwell too much on parental concerns. But another fascination I am inclined to perceive in films are film execution and outstanding technicalities. I have seen Ellen Ongkeko-Marfil’s Mga Pusang Gala (Stray Cats). I have to say that its technicalities in Boses, especially its photography, have been compromised a lot.
I got acquainted with Mozart and Schubert’s works also from films. Amadeus has been one of my favorite films directed by Milos Forman and based on Peter Shaffer’s play. Elfriede Jelenik’s Nobel Prize for Literature La Pianiste (The Piano Teacher) is directed by Michael Haneke. They are the two of my favorite composers. Boses did expand my musical knowledge through the composers Bartok, Haydn, Vivaldi, and Massenet. Their musical pieces range from emotions of sorrow, rage, and joy. In the end of the film, Vivaldi’s ‘Spring’ endows with a symbolism of new life for the characters.
Froilan Medina and Rody Vera’s story screenplay deals with social problems in our country. Despite the story’s sensitivity in its subject matter, they were able to inject humor with our antagonists’ plight for redemption. Although I am not entirely overwhelmed with the story’s premeditated dealings with its subject matter, which is ironic in a way. Most of the Filipinos view films and expect stories’ contrivance in instilling values. I am not a moralist and I certainly have the opposite precognition. The end is pleasingly hopeful with a touch of cynicism not uncommon in critics. Although it is meritorious in a way since it brings a parcel of artistic awareness to a broader audience. Sometimes it’s the final avenue for aesthetic expression. Films use legendary albeit dead artists to uplift their works, but living artists and the present state of affairs of the art world need to be placed on the limelight as well. Films that portray living not-so-established artists take a risk, but it is a laudable one.
Boses brings about two talented violinists in our generation. Duque and Bolipata’s striking violin performances transcend a breath of fresh air. Their plight for a new beginning did materialize in the end. Life is so good. If this mirrors our society, I am sure everyone will be happy. Its undertaking of the harsh reality is a reminder of our imperfections. Yes, we Filipinos are always hopeful. We hope for a better life. The forgiveness we anticipate and the sympathetic nature of Filipinos will always succeed in the end. We might be healed, but it doesn’t mean that we will never be wounded again. Blame it on our supposed Filipino values.
.



